To get a pretty clear picture of where the line is drawn between the two main sides in the debate over human-induced climate change, take a look at two recent op-eds in the Washington Post: the first by former governor of Alaska and future president Sarah Palin, who talks about the politicized science behind what will be discussed at Copenhagen; and the second being and a rebuttal to her piece, penned by Alan Leshner, the CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the executive publisher of the journal Science.
Pearls of witticism from 'Bo the Blogger: Kushibo's Korea blog... Kushibo-e Kibun... Now with Less kimchi, more nunchi. Random thoughts and commentary (and indiscernibly opaque humor) about selected social, political, economic, and health-related issues of the day affecting "foreans," Koreans, Korea and East Asia, along with the US, especially Hawaii, Orange County and the rest of California, plus anything else that is deemed worthy of discussion. Forza Corea!
Sarah Palin is like the secret weapon to destroy American conservativism. She must have been born in a lab or something to be some kind of crazy Manchurian Candidate. I swear.
ReplyDeleteI thought George Bush was the secret weapon to destroy American conservatism.
ReplyDeleteAnd he almost succeeded.